- Those Twin Peaks
July 13, 2013
Recent debates miss the point that ecology doesn't necessarily have to be pitted against development.
- Your say
July 6, 2013
From football to the love of books, your comments say it all.
- Deflating victim Narendra Modi
July 6, 2013
With the CBI chargesheet in the Ishrat case, the carefully crafted Modi-versus-The Rest campaign has gone for a toss.
- In This Section
- Entire Website
From the Times Of India
- MOST POPULAR
With her fixed notions and a firmly-held worldview Margaret Thatcher saved Britain but lost Europe
The United Kingdom has had its share of remarkable twentieth-century prime ministers. David Lloyd George was in many respects the architect of victory over Germany in the First World War. Winston Churchill led the country to victory in the second. Clement Attlee spearheaded the transformation of British society after 1945 with the creation of the welfare state. None of them, however, lent their names to an "ism";there would have been something almost un-British about it. All that changed in 1979 with the election of Margaret Thatcher. The outlines of Thatcherism on the socio-economic front are well known: rolling back the frontiers of the state, emphasising individual responsibility, and championing entrepreneurial creativity. Today, the legacy of Thatcherism is ambivalent. On the one hand, Thatcher pulled the country out of the economic tailspin of the 1970s;on the other hand, her war on regulation facilitated the banking extravaganzas that eventually resulted in the ongoing financial crisis. What is less well grasped, however, is Thatcher's legacy in foreign policy, which is at least as important and equally complex.
After all, the sobriquet "Iron Lady" was bestowed on Thatcher not by British miners or Thatcher's many other domestic opponents, but by the Soviet press in the mid-1980 s. It reflected her reputation for toughness on the military and diplomatic fronts, particularly in the joint effort with US President Ronald Reagan to strengthen the West's nuclear defences during the Cold War. Thatcher's uncompromising struggle against Irish republican terrorism earned her the undying hatred of the Irish Republican Army (IRA). Her most complete victory came in the 1982 Falklands War, when she dispatched a British task force - at considerable risk - to expel an Argentinian junta from the Falklands Islands. Thatcher's relations with her partners in the European Economic Community were more pacific, but the leaders of continental Europe nevertheless feared the vigour with which she represented British interests in Brussels. After decades of drift and decline, Thatcher re-established the UK as a major force on the international scene.
Three interlocking - but not always mutually reinforcing - impulses drove Thatcher's foreign policy. First, the Iron Lady hated dictators and bullies of any kind. And her opposition to the Soviet bloc was informed by a deep sympathy for the dissident movements in such places as Czechoslovakia and Poland. Underpinning this hatred of dictators was the second impulse that drove Thatcher's foreign policy: her passionate commitment to democracy. Thatcher's close relationship with Reagan was based, above all, on their shared belief in economic liberalisation at home and democracy promotion abroad, at least in the Communist world.
Despite her reputation for inflexibility, Thatcher often showed remarkable imagination. She was the first Western leader to recognise the importance of Mikhail Gorbachev, whom she defined as "a man we can do business with" even before his elevation to the Soviet leadership. In this respect, she played a key role in ending the Cold War.
Where Thatcher ultimately came unstuck was in her third principle, which was a preoccupation with German power - and a related profound ambivalence about European integration. Thatcher belonged to a generation that had gone through World War II and naturally feared German power and German unification. By the late 1980s, she began to view the growing influence of the European Commission in Brussels not only as an encroachment on the democratic rights of the British people, but also as a vehicle for the reassertion of German power on the continent. This divided her not only from the French, for whom Europe was a device to contain its historical enemy, but also from German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, whose genuine commitment to a united Europe she mistakenly saw as a fig leaf for the reassertion of German power.
In 1989-90, Thatcher's commitment to democracy and her fear of Germany were in direct contradiction. The fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Soviet bloc cleared the way for the German people to express their democratic desire for reunification. Thatcher now expressed concern that a united republic would "once again, dominate the whole of Europe. " For a time, it seemed as if she would team up with Gorbachev and French President Francois Mitterand to prevent it. It was only with difficulty that the United States and her own advisers persuaded her to accept the inevitable.
Nearly 25 years later, as Europe struggles with its sovereign debt crisis and the ever-widening gulf between Berlin and continent's periphery, Thatcher's concerns seem less far-fetched. Her failure of imagination in the 1980s was to insist on the renationalisation of the powers drifting toward Brussels, rather than allowing for the different European countries to buy in to the project of integration democratically, through the creation of a single electoral and political space. Of course, the resulting loss of British sovereignty would have been unacceptable for Thatcher and indeed for the British people. But such a program would at least have given London a positive agenda toward Europe, instead of its half-in, half-out approach of the past three decades.
The writer teaches at the University of Cambridge
Copyright: Foreign Affairs;www. foreignaffairs. com
Register for Full Access to the Crest Edition
Don't have a Facebook Account? Sign up for Times Crest here.
Subscribe to The Times of India Crest Edition and stay connected with our unequalled network of correspondents, analysts, writers and editors to figure the changes bubbling below the surface of society.