- Internet revolutionary
July 6, 2013
Wael Ghonim proves uprisings too can be 'liked, shared & tweeted'.
- Mirror, mirror on the wall
July 6, 2013
Thousands of art lovers in Paris are staring at themselves in Anish Kapoor's distorting mirrors. What do they see?
- Gun to the head
June 29, 2013
For Pakistan, it's time to harp on 'the Kashmir issue' again, this time with clear linkages to the mess in Afghanistan.
- In This Section
- Entire Website
From the Times Of India
- MOST POPULAR
Starting this week, McDonald's is posting calorie information for all items on its menus across the US, in a bid to improve diets and reduce obesity. New York City has mandated that chain restaurants post calories since 2008, and the federal health care law adopted in 2010 will eventually require fast-food restaurants across the US to do so.
While the alarm over obesity is fairly recent, the notion of using "scientific" knowledge to guide the dietary habits of ordinary people - particularly the less well off - is not. The fate of earlier campaigns suggests that it will take much more than calorie information to change food ways.
Nutritional recommendations were born at the end of the 19th century with the discovery that humans need 20 calories per pound of weight each day;55 to 65 per cent of this energy intake ought to come from carbohydrates, a quarter from fats and something over 10 per cent from proteins.
These guidelines did not emerge only from scientific inquiry but also from a desire to maximise efficiency. In 1888, the American chemist Wilbur O Atwater devised a series of formulas that would help people get the most energy from the least food. Economics and physiology would be joined in what he called "the pecuniary economy of food. " Atwater pioneered "scientific eating. "
The notion appealed to French physicians, who had been looking for ways to improve working-class health and budgets. Their program of "rational eating" aimed to instruct the poor to keep food expenses within the limits of their budgets. They urged the substitution of protein-rich legumes for red meat, pasta for sausages, and sugared beverages for wine.
They believed that ignorance was the problem. Nutrition facts were put next to the items on the menu cards in factory canteens and working-class restaurants. Scales at eating places helped customers monitor their weight.
The program flopped - except in prisons, where lower calorie supply per inmate induced savings - as French workers continued to enjoy their sausage and wine.
Americans though embraced the fad. In 1914 the New York State Board of Health introduced a "scientific restaurant, " where staff luncheons were made according to "the most modern dietary theories. " Restaurants across the country began to list energy and protein content on their menus.
By 1920, Americans were so calorie conscious that a romance novel, Ethel M Kelley's Outside Inn, featured calories as a prominent theme. In 1924, the Restaurant Owners' Association toyed with providing diners with printed advice on well-balanced meals "from the point of view of calories. "
None of these initiatives lasted. For European and American consumers, hearty and palatable meals outweighed scientific formulas every time.
The history of "scientific eating" offers several lessons. Nutritional campaigns can succeed in influencing consumer behavior only if they take into account the sensual joys of eating. The French continued to eat their red meat and drink their red wine because rich meals gave them a sense of belonging to a community. Similarly, American consumers after World War II saw access to plentiful, ever cheaper and ever less healthy foods as proof of the American promise - even if the impact on their waistlines, and well-being, has been disastrous.
In an era of stagnant wages, dystopian politics and cultural anomie, eating indulgent if unhealthful food has become a last redoubt of enjoyment for Americans who don't feel they have much control in their lives.
Higher incomes and better educations - in the classroom, not on the menu board - will do more to solve the obesity epidemic than mandating the disclosure of calorie counts. Before we blame the poor and the overweight for their inability to manage their budgets or control their appetites, we might want to think not only about the foods they encounter in the supermarket and on television but about a culture that relies ever more on unhealthy foods to breathe meaning and purpose into everyday life. NYT
Register for Full Access to the Crest Edition
Don't have a Facebook Account? Sign up for Times Crest here.