- A bird, not a bomber
July 6, 2013
During the Lebanon war of 1982, an Israeli pilot refused to bomb a building when he suspected - correctly - that it was a school.
- The Egypt effect
July 6, 2013
From Benghazi to Abu Dhabi, Islamists are drawing lessons from Morsi's ouster.
- Restless in Rio
June 29, 2013
A protest in the Confederations Cup has become the catalyst for a nationwide movement.
- In This Section
- Entire Website
From the Times Of India
- MOST POPULAR
Banking on the green cause
Blasting off mountains to reach coal in Appalachia or churning out millions of tons of carbon dioxide to extract oil from sand in Alberta are among environmentalists' biggest industrial irritants. But they are also legal and lucrative. For a growing number of banks, however, that does not seem to matter. After years of legal entanglements arising from environmental messes and increased scrutiny of banks that finance the dirtiest industries, several large commercial lenders are taking a stand on industry practices they regard as risky to their reputations and bottom lines.
In the most recent example, the banking giant Wells Fargo noted "considerable attention and controversy" surrounding mountaintop removal mining, and said that its involvement with companies engaged in it was "limited and declining. " The bank was a small player in the sector, representing about $78 million in bonds and loan financing for such companies from 2008 to April of this year.
But the policy shift by Wells Fargo follows others over the last two years, including moves by Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America and Citibank, to increase scrutiny of lending to companies involved in mountaintop removal - or to end the lending altogether. HSBC, which is based in London, has curtailed its relationships with some producers of palm oil, which is often linked to deforestation in developing countries. Dutch lender Rabobank, meanwhile, has applied a nine-point checklist of conditions for would-be oil and gas borrowers that includes commitments to improve environmental performance and protect water quality.
In some cases, the changing policies represent an attempt to burnish green credentials in areas where the banks had little interest, and there is no indication that companies engaged in the objectionable practices cannot find financing elsewhere. Still, analysts suggest that heated debate over climate change and other environmental considerations is forcing investors to take a much harder - and uncomfortable - look at where they extend credit, and to whom.
"It's one thing if your borrower is dumping cyanide in a river, " said Karina Litvack, head of governance and sustainable investment with F&C Investments, London. "But if they're dumping carbon dioxide into the air, which is not exactly illegal - what do you do? Banks are in a quandary, because they are competing for business, and if they get holier-than-thou and start to play policeman, they risk allowing other banks to take that business. "
Environmental risk has been on the radar for lenders since the early 1990s, when courts began forcing some measure of responsibility on banks for polluting factories and other environmental problems, but since then, most major banks have developed environmental risk management divisions as part of their commercial banking due diligence efforts.
Now, the rise of murkier issues like global warming, along with increasing scrutiny by environmental groups of banks' investments in many other industries - like oil and gas development, nuclear power, thermal electricity generation, oil sands, fuel pipeline construction, dams, forestry and even certain types of agriculture - are nudging lenders into new territory. "We're taking a much closer look at a much broader variety of issues, not all of which are captured under state and local laws, " said Stephanie Rico, spokeswoman for the environmental affairs group at Wells Fargo.
Activists pointed to large protests last week by many climate groups outside the Royal Bank of Scotland in Edinburgh. At least a dozen protesters have been arrested in demonstrations against the bank's financing of oil sands development in Canada. The Royal Bank of Canada, meanwhile, responding to intense pressure from environmental advocates denouncing the bank's financing of oil sands projects, hosted 18 international banks in Toronto in February for "a day of learning" on the "regulatory, social and environmental issues" surrounding oil sands.
Globally, banks and environmental advocates are seeking to make things easier by developing best practices and other voluntary standards. Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase and Morgan Stanley helped initiate the Carbon Principles, which aim to standardise the assessment of "carbon risks in the financing of electric power projects" in the United States. Several international financial institutions - including HSBC, Munich Re and others - have formed the Climate Principles, which aim to encourage the management of climate change "across the full range of financial products and services, " according to the compact's website.
In the US, mountaintop removal mining has become both increasingly common and contentious, as coal companies vie to feed the nation's appetite for inexpensive electricity. An expeditious and disruptive form of surface mining, it involves blasting off the tops of mountains and dumping the debris in valleys and streams below. A report published by the Sierra Club and the Rainforest Action Network estimated that nine banks were the primary lenders for companies engaged in mountaintop removal mining in Appalachia, and that they had provided nearly $4 billion in loans and bond underwriting to those companies since 2008.
The Rainforest Action Network, which has headed a campaign to highlight financial institutions with connections to the mining, said this month that the policy shifts were chipping away at the financing. The group noted that Bank of America and JP Morgan have eliminated that and all other connections to these companies, subjecting all future engagements with companies involved in mountaintop removal mining to "enhanced review. "
Rebecca Tarbotton, the executive director of the Rainforest Action Network, said in a published statement that the banks' moves send a clear signal that these companies have a high risk profile and other banks should beware. "Bottom line, " she added, "as access to capital becomes more constrained it will be harder for mining companies to finance the blowing up of out mountains. "
Register for Full Access to the Crest Edition
Don't have a Facebook Account? Sign up for Times Crest here.