- 'He's my biggest opponent, but whenever…
May 4, 2013
After being denied twice, World No. 1 Lee Chong Wei is still hungry for an Olympic gold. Rio 2016 will be last chance, he says. - The Youngistan imbroglio
May 4, 2013
Cricket was a gentleman's game but that did not mean that it was gentlemanly;it just meant it created an idea of fairness, which did not always… - In england, RVP is this season's MVP
April 27, 2013
The stylish north London club's lack of ambition was proving an impediment in Robin van Persie's own journey.
- In This Section
- Entire Website
From the Times Of India
- LATEST
- MOST POPULAR
- No spy angle to transmitter found along China border in Himachal Pradesh
- Civilians killed in anti-Maoist operations in Bastar; probe ordered
- NPCIL reassures scientists on Kudankulam nuclear plant safety
- Denmark's Emmelie de Forest wins Eurovision song contest
- Little chance peace talks would succeed, Syrian President Assad says



Is Kallis the greatest all-rounder?
Who is the greatest allrounder ever? Garry Sobers or Jacques Kallis? Only a generation which hasn't seen Sobers bat, bowl or field could come up with that question. Let me start off by saying that Kallis is phenomenal, a better cricketer than the Imran Khans and Kapil Devs who preceded him. No one can take away the staggering figures Kallis has notched up in every department of the game, and he is by far the best cricketer of the past two generations.
However, to compare him or anybody else to Sobers is unfair on Sobers.
Let me explain why. What Kallis lacks is grace. It's easy to imagine the South African as a rugby player, or even an American Rules footballer, but Garfield Sobers could not have been anything else but a cricketer. There was nothing mechanical about him, and that's something one cannot say even about Don Bradman. Sobers was the most naturally complete cricketing creation ever. Importantly, he was a cricketer's cricketer, in the sense that unless you have bowled to him or batted against him, you cannot judge how good he was. His effortlessness in every department of the game put his contemporaries to shame. God must have created Sobers in his spare time.
I'm sure many will disagree with me, but Sobers wasn't a statesman of the game in the way that Bradman was, although he was a very, very important figure for Barbados and West Indies cricket. Sobers, at heart, was happy-go-lucky, the kind who parties hard and plays harder. In his playing days, he came across as honest and extremely humble. He would not train or go to the gym like a Kapil or an Imran. He just had enormous energy and loved and respected the game beyond belief. The amount of cricket he played was phenomenal, yet a day before an important game he wasn't averse to getting drunk and bellowing, "I have to prove to myself I can bat, bowl and field!" Then he would go out and dazzle the world and we would watch in hushed silence. Even when he fielded, Sobers had a distinct presence, and would stand out among the 10 others in the field. Most important of all, he was a man of integrity. He would walk when he knew he was out.
Sobers never wore a thigh pad, and would just wrap a towel around and come in to bat. I couldn't help asking him once why he would do that, and he growled back at me, "Bish, what is this f****** bat for?" That was Sobers for you. It's not for him these comparisons, these statistics. He was least interested in figures. I remember in the third match of the World XI-versus-Australia series in Jan 1972, he was having a hard time from the media and scored 254 in the second innings at Melbourne. In the four sessions he batted he didn't take his pads off, and didn't eat anything. He just clenched his teeth, and drowned two large pegs of brandy and then knocked the hell out of Dennis Lillee. His natural grace didn't mean he was ever short of grit. You could not mess with Sobers.
If Sobers hadn't played cricket, of course today we would probably be hailing Kallis as the greatest allrounder of any era.
(As told to Partha Bhaduri)
Register for Full Access to the Crest Edition
Don't have a Facebook Account? Sign up for Times Crest here.
Reader's opinion (4)
Difficult to say that kallis is a greatest batsman ever. Sachin definitely is more complete...way ahead of the rest. But, kallis is superior as an allrounder. Sachin was a good part time slow baller (sometimes offie and sometimes leggie). But, Kallis fares better than him in bowling department.
The fact the Sobers played at no 6 for most of his career and made big scores like 365 makes him better allrounder than Kallis. Kallis took more than 100 tests to make his first double. No doubt Kallis is one of the greatest batsman & allrounder, Sobers is definietely ahead of him.
Sobers is a genius but Botham Miller and Imran are greater challengers as allrounders to Sobers than Kallis,who could all turn the complexion of a match to a far greater extent.Imran with his match-winning prowess was the best cricketer after Sobers,while Botham the most complete allrounder.
Some how we indians cannot digest the fact that someone is being compared to sachin n that is so evident from the fact that we r reducing the kallis debate to allrounders only...why cannot he just be compared as the greatest batsman ever? jus look at his figures. more centuries dan ponting..

