- Tall tales
July 20, 2013
For India's tallest family, life is about finding shoes that fit to cinema seats with legroom.
- The magician's way
July 20, 2013
A farmer uses his fertile imagination to promote organic farming in Bihar.
- Home stay
July 20, 2013
There is no denying that an increasing number of rural and urban women are doing just that — nothing.
- In This Section
- Entire Website
From the Times Of India
- MOST POPULAR
Superheroes and law
Do privacy laws protect Superman's real identity? Who is liable for damages when a Batman battle results in mass destruction of property? Is evidence obtained through mind-reading admissible in court? A popular blog - a hot favourite with lawyers - is calling into question the legality of many superheroes' actions
Is Superman's heat vision a weapon? If so, would the Second Amendment - which enumerates the right of Americans to bear arms - protect his right to melt pistols and cook hamburgers with it? You might not have thought to ask these questions. But a new blog and the interest it is generating shows there are people who look at an epic battle between superheroes and super-villains and really, really want to know who should be found liable for the broken buildings and shattered streets.
Those people now have a blog called 'Law and the Multiverse: Superheroes, supervillains, and the law', which was kicked off November 30. The blog addresses questions like: "What if someone is convicted for murder, and then the victim comes back to life?" And whether mutants are a legally recognisable class entitled to constitutional protection from discrimination.
Law and the Multiverse is the deadpan creation of two lawyers, James Daily, in Missouri, and Ryan Davidson in Indiana. Both are 28;they have only met online but collaborate like old friends. Daily said the inspiration for the blog came over dinner with his wife and friends. They began discussing whether the paralleldimension versions of a super-villain could somehow be brought to justice in a single trial. Once he discussed his plans for the blog, Davidson got in touch to offer his ideas and support - or, as he put it: "Hey, this looks awesome! Do you want a collaborator?"
In the weeks that the site has been active it has attracted a great deal of online attention, with enthusiastic posts about it on popular sites like Slashdot, BoingBoing and the Volokh Conspiracy, a blog run by law professors. The comments section is especially lively, as participants debate how many superheroes could dance on the theoretical head of a statutory pin.
"We look for something that has a good legal hook and a good in-universe hook" and then rev up the cultural blender, Daily explained. "We start from the premise that the comic book universe - most comic book universes - seem to be pretty similar to the real world, " with their police and courts and prisons. And so Daily and Davidson asked whether it was possible to reconcile the imaginary and the real, things like immortal superheroes and estate law. "To our surprise often it is reconcilable, " Daily said, whether in modern legal doctrines or centuries-old legal arcana like the British common-law rule against perpetuities and the law of outlawry.
Other topics include the admissibility of evidence obtained through mind reading by Professor X of the X-men. Would Cyclops qualify for workplace protection under the Americans with Disabilities Act? Probably. Or would it be illegal to attempt to reveal a superhero's secret identity? Likely, as the courts have held that a right to privacy includes "emotional solitude. " And just how hard would it be to get insurance against the super-villains who keep knocking your house over?
The answers are dry, technical and funny in their earnestness. The Second Amendment, Daily suggested, would protect many powers, but "at least some superpowers would qualify as dangerous or unusual weapons that are "well beyond the power of weapons allowed even by permit. " Those powers would be tightly regulated, if not banned outright.
Then there's this jurisprudential nugget: When Batman, the DC Comics hero, nabs crooks, is the evidence gathered against the bad guys admissible in court? Not if he is working so closely with Commissioner Gordon that his feats fall under the "state actor" doctrine, in which a person is deemed to be acting on behalf of government and thus is subject to the restrictions on government power. In fact, he might be courting a lawsuit claiming violations of civil rights from those who were nabbed. "Either all of the criminals in Gotham have incompetent attorneys, the state action doctrine in the DC universe is weaker than it is in the real world, or Gordon has actually managed to keep his reliance on Batman a secret, " Daily wrote. "I'm going to opt for the second explanation. "
Ilya Somin, a constitutional law scholar at George Mason University, applauded the new blog. He said. it might prove the foundation for something more important some day. "Over the next several decades we're going to see technology and powers emerge that today only exist in science fiction and comic books, " he said, citing Arthur C Clarke's famous saying that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". "It may be reasonable to ask, " Somin said, "how should the law treat those kinds of issues when they emerge?"
Daily acknowledged that he and Davidson have a semi-serious purpose. "We both hope the blog has a certain educational component. " Does that mean they would like to see more young people apply to law school? "Oh, I hope not, " Davidson said. "Not with the market the way it is. "
Register for Full Access to the Crest Edition
Don't have a Facebook Account? Sign up for Times Crest here.