Instead of confusing guidelines on surrogacy, need for ART law | Life | Times Crest
Popular on Times Crest
  • In This Section
  • Entire Website
  • Death in silicon alleys
    April 6, 2013
    For many, agate's a stone that heals. Not so, though, for artisans who cut and polish it in Gujarat's Khambat. Several are being struck…
  • Not an alternative
    March 9, 2013
    Indian cancer specialists say the penchant for seeking out dubious 'alternate' treatment options for even severe cases of the disease can…
  • Pregnant and popping pills
    March 9, 2013
    The latest findings about drug use during pregnancy have ignited concerns about the effects of medications on the unborn child.
More in this Section
Leaving tiger watching to raise rice Ecologist Debal Deb, who did his post-doctoral research from IISc in…
The crorepati writer He's the man who gives Big B his lines. RD Tailang, the writer of KBC.
Chennai-Toronto express Review Raja is a Canadian enthusiast whose quirky video reviews of Tamil…
Don't parrot, perform Maestro Buddhadev Dasgupta will hold a masterclass on ragas.
A man's man Shivananda Khan spent his life speaking up for men who have sex with men.
Bhowmick and the first family of Indian football At first glance, it would be the craziest set-up in professional football.
From Times Blogs
The end of Detroit
Jobs in Detroit's car factories are moving to India.
Chidanand Rajghatta
How I love the word ‘dobaara’...
Can ‘bindaas’ or ‘jhakaas’ survive transliteration?
Shobhaa De
Anand marte nahin...
India's first superstar died almost a lonely life.
Robin Roy

Instead of confusing guidelines on surrogacy, need for ART law


BUNDLE OF JOY: A gay American couple looks at their daughter born to a surrogate mother in Mumbai. The new rules do not allow them or single men to have babies through surrogacy

Experts say the Centre's new rules will only limit the number of foreigners coming to India rather than protecting surrogates and couples who sign contracts with them.

Foreigners who are gay, single, have livein partners or have been married for less than two years will no longer be able to employ a surrogate in India to experience parenthood, according to new guidelines issued by the central government. The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) also puts the responsibility squarely on the doctors if a child born to a surrogate mother is denied a visa by the parents' country. While experts agree there is a need to regulate the burgeoning surrogacy industry, president of the Indian Society of Assisted Reproduction (ISAR) Dr Manish Banker tells TOI-Crest that different guidelines issued by different government agencies have only created confusion

Do you agree with the new MHA guidelines?

Our country softened its stand on same-sex relationships when sex between two consenting adults was deemed not illegal. However, it is still a complicated issue. One has to adhere to the laws and norms of the country one lives in.

What prompted the ministry to issue fresh visa guidelines to foreigners coming to India for surrogacy?

The fresh guidelines aim to pre-empt legal issues and other problems before a child is born rather than firefighting after the birth. In the past, there have been legal complications involving newborns of couples coming from countries where surrogacy or gay marriages are not legal.

What are the immediate implications which clinics offering surrogacy to foreign couples will face following the MHA diktat?

Some surrogates may already be pregnant with children of gay couples or live-in partners who no longer qualify for surrogacy in India, according to the fresh guidelines. Others may have given egg and sperm samples. Most importantly there are frozen embryos with us from couples and singles whose initial cycles have failed. These are potential lives which cannot be thrown away. What should we do with them? The guidelines were issued in July 2012, but some Mumbai clinics were notified only in late December 2012. MHA has to specify a cut-off date for implementation of these guidelines as there are nearly 600 registered clinics in India where surrogacy procedures may have been initiated at different levels. Secondly, the MHA guidelines are not concurrent with the Ministry of Health guidelines issued by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) which allows people in live-in relationships and those married for less than two years to go ahead with surrogacy.

What impact will these fresh guidelines have on medical tourism?

Some 2, 000-odd surrogacy procedures are done annually in the country. Surrogacy is growing very fast with 15 to 20 per cent rise in the numbers every year. Currently, this industry is worth Rs 150 to Rs 200 crore considering that each in-vitro fertilisation-surrogacy procedure costs an average of Rs 7 lakh to Rs 8 lakh in India. There is the possibility of gays, singles and those in live-in relationships heading to another surrogacy hub like Bangkok.

Will these new guidelines secure the rights of surrogates?

Surrogates will not benefit from these guidelines which will only limit the number of foreigners coming to the country for the procedure. To protect the rights of the surrogates and of couples who sign contracts with surrogates, the ART (Assisted Reproductive Technology) Bill, which is ready since 2010, needs to be passed and made into a law. It protects all rights of surrogates including insuring her life and providing for compensation to be given to her family in case of her death. Plus, rights of couples also need to be protected as there have been instances where surrogates have threatened to terminate the pregnancy if their demands for more money are not fulfilled. These complexities can be addressed properly only by a law.

Why has the ART bill not become an Act as yet?

That is the most pertinent question which needs to be answered, especially when India has emerged as the global hub for in-vitro fertilisation and surrogacy procedures for childless couples. A final draft has been ready since 2010. It has been updated, put in the public domain and debated. The onus is now on the central government to table the bill and pass it for ART to become a law. If there is a law, there will be no need for numerous, confusing guidelines. If the ART law is implemented, ICMR can start inspecting clinics and register them. Even the MHA has demanded that clinics be registered under its fresh guidelines. How can ICMR inspect clinics if there is no law which authorises that? The ART Bill should be made into a law at the earliest so that the 'dos' and 'don'ts' are clear and the stakeholder knows the punitive action to be taken if the same is violated.

Other Times Group news sites
The Times of India | The Economic Times
इकनॉमिक टाइम्स | ઈકોનોમિક ટાઈમ્સ
Mumbai Mirror | Times Now
Indiatimes | नवभारत टाइम्स
महाराष्ट्र टाइम्स
Living and entertainment
Timescity | iDiva | Bollywood | Zoom
| Technoholik |


itimes | Dating & Chat | Email
Hot on the Web
Book print ads | Online shopping | Business solutions | Book domains | Web hosting
Business email | Free SMS | Free email | Website design | CRM | Tenders | Remit
Cheap air tickets | Matrimonial | Ringtones | Astrology | Jobs | Property | Buy car
Online Deals
About us | Advertise with us | Terms of Use and Grievance Redressal Policy | Privacy policy | Feedback
Copyright© 2010 Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved. For reprint rights: Times Syndication Service