Sita and sexuality | Culture | Times Crest
Popular on Times Crest
  • In This Section
  • Entire Website
  • Telling stories of his experiments with truth
    July 20, 2013
    A veteran Gandhian fuses the power of storytelling with simplicity and warmth.
  • Play! Stop!
    July 13, 2013
    A pithy play can be a satisfying theatre experience as the growing popularity of the Short + Sweet Festival proves.
  • 'I obsess over my music'
    July 13, 2013
    At Coke Studio, no one tells AR Rahman to make this song, make that song. But, he says, it's also nice to work to a director's vision.
More in this Section
Profiles
Leaving tiger watching to raise rice Ecologist Debal Deb, who did his post-doctoral research from IISc in…
The crorepati writer He's the man who gives Big B his lines. RD Tailang, the writer of KBC.
Chennai-Toronto express Review Raja is a Canadian enthusiast whose quirky video reviews of Tamil…
Don't parrot, perform Maestro Buddhadev Dasgupta will hold a masterclass on ragas.
A man's man Shivananda Khan spent his life speaking up for men who have sex with men.
Bhowmick and the first family of Indian football At first glance, it would be the craziest set-up in professional football.
From Times Blogs
The end of Detroit
Jobs in Detroit's car factories are moving to India.
Chidanand Rajghatta
How I love the word ‘dobaara’...
Can ‘bindaas’ or ‘jhakaas’ survive transliteration?
Shobhaa De
Anand marte nahin...
India's first superstar died almost a lonely life.
Robin Roy
Feminine force

Sita and sexuality

|


RAM, SITA AUR 'WOH' : When Surpanakha (played here by Ashavari Majumdar), the epitome of the bad woman, has the temerity to desire a man other than her husband, her nose and ears are brutally cut off by Lakshman

Indian mythology is replete with instances of violence against women, especially when they show a mind of their own.

In the hands of the patriarchy epics are weapons of mass deception. They are hurled in times of stress and change to bludgeon free speech and debate as the popular phrase, 'Lakshman Rekha - thus far and no further', suggests. They appear to underline certain values that are meant to validate a singularly myopic view of society - that of an increasingly shrill and despotic male dominated hierarchy.
At times, all it takes is the sound of an ankle bell tinkling in the dark to unravel the notion that epics and myths serve only to preserve the inalienable rights of a dominant male interpretation. The strength of the ancient epics is that they suggest multiple strands of consciousness, with every new generation adding to the layered demands of a shared history. Lakshman may draw the line, the cordon sanitaire with which men have tried to protect their territorial rights over the female body. Sita will step out of it.

Already, it would seem the horrendous and tragic history of the young woman who was kidnapped and butchered so brutally by a group of men, unknown to her, has passed into the myth-making process with which societies deal with the unspeakable. If we do not include rape to the list, it is that by making a fetish of the act we are, in fact, adding to its secretly lustful aura. The mythologising of rape distracts us from the more vicious suppression of the female body, or its more potent manifestation, female sexuality that has always been a source of fear and fascination in the dual images of the feminine force rampant or supine that we find in our traditional images.

Sita's ankle bells, kinkini, have an ancient resonance that echoes through the chapters of the Ramayana. Brother Lakshman consoles grief-stricken Rama who has lost Sita, a victim of the most well documented case of kidnapping and abduction by a powerful individual, the demon-King Ravana. Sita has tied her ornaments into a bundle made from a portion of her sari and thrown them down as she is being carried away.

Lakshman, the faithful brother, says, "I cannot recognise the yellow cloth of her sari into which she has tied her earrings, her bangles and her chain. But I can recognise her ankle bells. For that is all I see when I greet her every morning. " It is a delicate moment as rendered in dance and music.

Lakshman is the epitome of the decent god-fearing individual. He has not only left his own wife, Urmila behind at the palace to take part in the fourteen years of exile with his brother, he has willingly been deprived of his need to sleep.

Urmila, we are told, has asked for an additional boon, that Lakshman be spared from the need to sleep so that he can keep vigil all through the lonely nights of those fourteen years in the forest. She, on the other hand, will take on the burden of sleep and be perfectly still during his absence, a nice touch, one might add to keep her from straying!

At the same time, there is Lakshman's treatment of Surpanakha that is as brutal as it is significant. Of course, the standard excuse is that she is after all the 'other', a vile demoness;the sister of the despicable would be ravisher of Sita.

Consider, however, Surpanakha's own history. She was in love with her husband, who was cut down by her brother Ravana, who suspected that he was plotting to overthrow him from the throne of Srilanka. Like many other women in her position, she transferred her affection to Rama.

As she says, "When I saw him, I felt the stirrings of the love that I had once felt for my husband. " She became a woman obsessed. She had what may now be called an image make-over, using perhaps the professional skills of a dermatologist to lighten her skin, a trichologist to straighten her hair, a dental surgeon to whiten her teeth, a beautician to render her body tender and fragrant with special body soaps and unguents as we see advertised continually on our screens and presented herself to Rama as the most beautiful of women. Do we need to add that she may have been swayed in these matters by the dreaded 'Western' influence?
It left Rama unfazed. There the matter might have ended, but what does the brave Lakshman do? He takes on his role of protector of his brother's virtue;maybe all those sleepless nights have rendered his tetchy. He cuts off the nose, the ears, and the breasts of Surpanakha. In short, exhibits a bestiality that our reading of the Ramayana condones since, after all, she is a member of the Ravana faction. She goes howling to her brother and sets in motion the war of good and evil.

Even more intriguing is a reading of the seduction of Shiva in the episode known as the Lure of the Enchantress, rendered today as the famous Mohiniattam dance. The gods and the demons are fighting on who should partake of the pot of nectar, amrit, that may be a code-name for the Bosun's Particle of today's churning of the elements that they have been struggling to obtain. To stop from the demons getting at the amrit, Vishnu takes on the form of the beautiful woman Mohini. She succeeds so well in her seduction that Shiva himself is aroused and Vishnu as Mohini allows himself to be impregnated. The child that is born of the union is the deity that draws thousands of devotees today at Sabarimalai, in Kerala.

Does it say something about female sexuality we ask? That even in its most seductive manifestation as Mohiniattam, the official sanction for flaunting it has to come from the essence of a male god, Vishnu taking on the lure of the enchantress?

Reader's opinion (4)

Sushant KishoreJan 17th, 2013 at 13:36 PM

Geeta Ji,quoting only a part of the whole truth is more dangerous than telling untruth.1st: It's neither Ram nor Laxman punished Suparnakha for showing her sexual desire for them.2nd:the punishment was too little as she almost killed Sita. 3rd:No mention of Laxman-Rekha in Original Valmiki Ramayan.

Sninsingen SaminadenJan 13th, 2013 at 21:01 PM

For me some aspects in Hinduism are the best and may be some other aspects of this same Hinduism are also the worst than any other religion.

Nikhil KumarJan 13th, 2013 at 19:50 PM

examples cannot be found in any other society. I believe the problem is within people like you who instead of doing anything useful would like to bash your own culture and society. Get over it this doesn't make you so called enlightened but highly ignorant.

Nikhil KumarJan 13th, 2013 at 19:46 PM

Ma'am with all due respect I don't understand repeatedly pointing out only few points of a particular culture which has been deteriorated over a millennia by people as it happens with any culture in a span of time and ignoring all the other good points like swayamvara, devi puja, etc. of which

 
Other Times Group news sites
The Times of India | The Economic Times
इकनॉमिक टाइम्स | ઈકોનોમિક ટાઈમ્સ
Mumbai Mirror | Times Now
Indiatimes | नवभारत टाइम्स
महाराष्ट्र टाइम्स
Living and entertainment
Timescity | iDiva | Bollywood | Zoom
| Technoholik | MensXP.com

Networking

itimes | Dating & Chat | Email
Hot on the Web
Hotklix
Services
Book print ads | Online shopping | Business solutions | Book domains | Web hosting
Business email | Free SMS | Free email | Website design | CRM | Tenders | Remit
Cheap air tickets | Matrimonial | Ringtones | Astrology | Jobs | Property | Buy car
Online Deals
About us | Advertise with us | Terms of Use and Grievance Redressal Policy | Privacy policy | Feedback
Copyright© 2010 Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved. For reprint rights: Times Syndication Service