2013: The Pakistan conundrum | Cover Story | Times Crest
Popular on Times Crest
  • In This Section
  • Entire Website
  • Movers and shakers Inc
    July 13, 2013
    Insiders say the Gymkhana is a way of life — quite literally.
  • Mission admission
    July 13, 2013
    The news of a member stumping up over a crore for entry to Mumbai’s Breach Candy club only proves that the allure of private clubs still holds…
  • Finer tastes
    July 13, 2013
    It is the culinary tradition and its grand interiors that Bengal Club is justifiably proud of.
More in this Section
Leaving tiger watching to raise rice Ecologist Debal Deb, who did his post-doctoral research from IISc in…
The crorepati writer He's the man who gives Big B his lines. RD Tailang, the writer of KBC.
Chennai-Toronto express Review Raja is a Canadian enthusiast whose quirky video reviews of Tamil…
Don't parrot, perform Maestro Buddhadev Dasgupta will hold a masterclass on ragas.
A man's man Shivananda Khan spent his life speaking up for men who have sex with men.
Bhowmick and the first family of Indian football At first glance, it would be the craziest set-up in professional football.
From Times Blogs
The end of Detroit
Jobs in Detroit's car factories are moving to India.
Chidanand Rajghatta
How I love the word ‘dobaara’...
Can ‘bindaas’ or ‘jhakaas’ survive transliteration?
Shobhaa De
Anand marte nahin...
India's first superstar died almost a lonely life.
Robin Roy

2013: The Pakistan conundrum


ISI MARK: President Zardari has only nominal influence over the ISI. It deliberately botched the security for his wife Benazir Bhutto to help get rid of her and has conspired for five years to get rid of him too

More important than the elections next spring is the issue of who will replace Kayani as chief of army staff.

The most dangerous country in the world, Pakistan, is entering what may be its most dangerous year ever. Toppling prime ministers, national elections, turnover at the top military position and the denouement in the war in Afghanistan all promise to make it a critical year for a country that is both under siege by terrorism and the center of the global jihadist movement.

Pakistan is a country in the midst of a long and painful crisis. Since 2001, according to the government, 45, 000 Pakistanis have died in terrorist related violence, including 7, 000 security personnel. Suicide bombings were unheard of before 911;there have been 300 since then. The country's biggest city, Karachi, is a battlefield. One measure of Pakistan's instability is that the country now has between 300 and 500 private security firms, employing 300, 000 armed guards, most run by ex-generals. The American intelligence community's new global estimate rates Pakistan among the most likely states in the world to fail by 2030.

Pakistan also remains a patron state sponsor of terror. Three of the five most wanted on America's counter terrorism list live in Pakistan. The mastermind of the 2008 Mumbai massacre and head of Lashkar-e-Taiba, Hafeez Saeed, make no effort to hide. He is feted by the army and the political elite, appears on television and calls for the destruction of India frequently and jihad against America and Israel. The head of the Afghan Taliban, Mullah Omar, shuttles between Pakistan intelligence (ISI) safe houses in Quetta and Karachi. The Amir of al Qaeda, Ayman Zawahiri, is probably hiding in a villa not much different than the one his predecessor was living in with his wives and children in Abbottabad until May 2011.

Pakistan also has the fastest growing nuclear arsenal in the world, bigger than Great Britain's. The nukes are in the hands of the generals, the civilian government has only nominal control. President Zardari has only nominal influence over the ISI as well;indeed it deliberately botched the security for his wife Benazir Bhutto to help get rid of her and it has conspired for five years to get rid of him too.

Against the odds, Zardari has survived. By next fall, he will have served five years becoming the first elected civilian leader to complete a full term in office and pass power to another elected government. It will be a major milestone for Pakistani democracy. Zardari has served years in prison. He often has been called a criminal by many, including in his own family, and the national symbol of corruption. Yet as President he presided over an major transfer of power from the Presidency to the Prime Minister's office, even the titular national command authority over the nukes, to ensure the country's is more democratic and stable.

The parliamentary election in the spring will be a replay of every Pakistani election since 1988 pitting Nawaz Sharif's party against the Bhutto's. Needless to say many Pakistanis are sick of the same old stale choices. But the odds favour the old parties. Both Sharif and Zardari are committed to improving relations cautiously with India and trying to reform the Pakistani economy. Both have troubled relations with the Army.

If Sharif returns to the Prime Minister's job for a third time it will be a remarkable next turn in his own odyssey. Sharif was removed from the office in 1999 in an illegal coup and barely escaped alive to go into exile in Saudi Arabia. His decision to withdraw Pakistan's troops in 1999 during the Kargil war prompted his fall from power, it also may have saved the world from nuclear destruction. It was a brave move. I remember talking to him and his family in the White House the day after he made the decision to pull back, you could see in his eyes that he knew the army would defame him but he knew he was in the right.
But many Pakistanis want a new face to lead their country. Out of desperation some are turning to cricket star Imran Khan or Canadian cleric Tahir-ul-Qadri to save Pakistan. The ISI is probably helping their campaigns behind the scenes just to stir up trouble for the others.

Whoever wins will inherit an economy and government that is in deep trouble. Two thirds of the 185 million Pakistanis are under 30, and 40 million of the 70 million 5 to 19 years old are not in school. Less than one million Pakistanis paid taxes last year. Power blackouts are endemic. Clean water is increasingly scarce even as catastrophic floods are more common. Growth is 3%, too little to keep up with population demand.

So it is no wonder that the generals prefer to have the civilians responsible for managing the unmanageable while they guard their prerogatives and decide national security issues. As important as the elections next spring will be, the far more important issue is who will be the next Chief of Army Staff.

The incumbent General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani was given an unprecedented three year extension in 2010. He is the epitome of the Pakistani officer corps and the so-called deep state. Pervez Musharraf made him Director General of the ISI in 2004. On his watch the Afghan Taliban recovered and regrouped in Quetta, Usama bin Laden built his hideout 800 yards outside Kayani's alma mater the Kakul Military Academy in Abbottabad in 2005, and planning began for the 2008 Lashkar e Tayyiba attack on Mumbai. His term expires in September.

The history of civilians choosing chiefs of army staff is not encouraging. Zulfikar Bhutto chose Zia ul Huq, who he called his 'monkey general' because he thought he was apolitical. Zia staged his own coup and then hung Zulfi. Nawaz Sharif picked Pervez Musharraf, quarreled over the Kargil war and fired Pervez who then staged his coup. No wonder Zardari just rolled over Kayani for another three years in 2010. It was the easy way out.

The next COAS will come from the shadowy group of a dozen corps commanders who run the army. They do not advertise their political views as a rule. By next summer a consensus will probably emerge in the inner circle on who should replace Kayani and the whole world will try to decipher the implications of the choice.

Washington will be watching all of this carefully. US-Pakistan relations are at a low point and may get worse. It is in Afghanistan that the relationship will be most tested in 2013. This past September the Taliban attacked a base called Camp Bastion destroying eight U. S. Marine jet aircraft and killing two Marines. The interrogation of the surviving Taliban fighter indicated the attack was planned at an ISI safe haven in Pakistan with Pakistani army expertise. Then in December the head of Afghan intelligence Asadullah Khalid was almost assassinated by a terrorist whom the Afghans say came from Pakistan and was sent by the ISI. More incidents like this promise to make 2013 another year of strained relations in the US-Pakistan deadly embrace.

Bruce Riedel is director of the Intelligence Project at the Brookings Institution. His next book, Avoiding Armageddon: America, India and Pakistan to the Brink and Back, will be out in February.

Reader's opinion (1)

Hitendrab Jan 21st, 2013 at 10:48 AM

How does it change anything in the world, All are the same who not only give protection to terrorist but also are involved in all kind of terror activities world vide.

Other Times Group news sites
The Times of India | The Economic Times
इकनॉमिक टाइम्स | ઈકોનોમિક ટાઈમ્સ
Mumbai Mirror | Times Now
Indiatimes | नवभारत टाइम्स
महाराष्ट्र टाइम्स
Living and entertainment
Timescity | iDiva | Bollywood | Zoom
| Technoholik | MensXP.com


itimes | Dating & Chat | Email
Hot on the Web
Book print ads | Online shopping | Business solutions | Book domains | Web hosting
Business email | Free SMS | Free email | Website design | CRM | Tenders | Remit
Cheap air tickets | Matrimonial | Ringtones | Astrology | Jobs | Property | Buy car
Online Deals
About us | Advertise with us | Terms of Use and Grievance Redressal Policy | Privacy policy | Feedback
Copyright© 2010 Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved. For reprint rights: Times Syndication Service